4.8 Article

Shared and independent functions of aPKCλ and Par3 in skin tumorigenesis

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 37, 期 37, 页码 5136-5146

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41388-018-0313-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. joint German Research Foundation (DFG) grant [NIE-1234/4-1, ID79/1-1]
  2. Koln Fortune grant [197/2013]
  3. DFG [ID79/2-1, CRC829/A10, CRC829/A01 + A05, NIE-1234/6-1]
  4. German Cancer Society
  5. [DFG-SFB832]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The polarity proteins Par3 and aPKC are key regulators of processes altered in cancer. Par3/aPKC are thought to dynamically interact with Par6 but increasing evidence suggests that aPKC and Par3 also exert complex-independent functions. Whereas aPKC. serves as tumor promotor, Par3 can either promote or suppress tumorigenesis. Here we asked whether and how Par3 and aPKC lambda genetically interact to control two-stage skin carcinogenesis. Epidermal loss of Par3, aPKC lambda, or both, strongly reduced tumor multiplicity and increased latency but inhibited invasion to similar extents, indicating that Par3 and aPKC lambda function as a complex to promote tumorigenesis. Molecularly, Par3/aPKC lambda cooperate to promote Akt, ERK and NF-kappa B signaling during tumor initiation to sustain growth, whereas aPKC lambda dominates in promoting survival. In the inflammatory tumorigenesis phase Par3/aPKC lambda cooperate to drive Stat3 activation and hyperproliferation. Unexpectedly, the reduced inflammatory signaling did not alter carcinogen-induced immune cell numbers but reduced IL-4 Receptor-positive stromal macrophage numbers in all mutant mice, suggesting that epidermal aPKC lambda and Par3 promote a tumor-permissive environment. Importantly, aPKC lambda also serves a distinct, carcinogen-independent role in controlling skin immune cell homeostasis. Collectively, our data demonstrates that Par3 and aPKC lambda cooperate to promote skin tumor initiation and progression, likely through sustaining growth, survival, and inflammatory signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据