4.7 Article

Dynamic pricing for deteriorating products with menu cost

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2017.02.001

关键词

Dynamic programming; Pricing; Menu costs; Deteriorating products

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71632008, 71522009, 71202068, 71371123, 71131005, 71632007, 71421002]
  2. Shanghai Pujiang Program
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120073120042]
  4. Program for Yong Teacher of Shanghai International Studies University [20161140026]
  5. Interdisciplinary Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University [11JCZ02]
  6. ShuGuang project of the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [09SG17]
  7. Shanghai Education Development Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retail operation practice has empirically demonstrated that menu costs (i.e., the costs of adjusting a price) play a critical role in retailer pricing decisions. In this paper, we propose four dynamic pricing models for deteriorating products based on different pricing adjustment frequencies with and without menu costs. Under Poisson demand, we provide (1) the rank of these models in terms of expected profits and note that (2) the optimal prices of deteriorating products consistently decrease over time when menu costs are negligible. To investigate the impact of menu costs on dynamic pricing decisions, we conduct several numerical experiments based on different menu costs, decay rates, holding costs and initial inventories. The results demonstrate that (1) the one-time price adjustments typically employed in practice provide the most benefit from dynamic pricing when menu costs are moderate and that (2) it is typically preferable to adjust the price in the middle of the products shelf life rather than to make early or late adjustments. The same conclusions follow under compound Poisson demand and general customer utility functions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据