4.5 Article

Tear inflammatory mediators and protein in eyes of post allogenic hematopoeitic stem cell transplant patients

期刊

OCULAR SURFACE
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 352-367

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2018.04.007

关键词

Ocular GVHD; Graft versus host disease; Hematopoetic stem cell transplant; Dry eye; Tear cytokines; Inflammatory mediators; Tear proteins

资金

  1. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India [A-177, F.8-177/A-177/2012/RS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: To analyze tear cytokines levels and their correlation to ocular surface parameters in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (allo-HSCT) patients. Methods: Prospective longitudinal study of allo-HSCT patients and controls for ocular surface evaluation (OSDI, TBUT, Schirmer's test, staining scores), tear biochemical analysis for protein, cytokines [IL-10, IL-12, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-17, interferon (IFN)-gamma, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, VEGF], MMPs [MMP 2, 9, 7, 13, 10 and chemokine (IL-8)], & VEGF on three consecutive follow up visits (at three monthly interval) was done. Results: Of 24 post allo-HSCT patients (19 males, 5 females) & 12 controls (mean age 34.3 + 5.8 years) enrolled, 20 patients [mean age 33.4 + 7.77 years; mean time of recruitment of 5.2 + 2.12 months following alloHSCT] who completed three consecutive follow up visits were included for analysis. Ocular GVHD (oGVHD) was seen in 8 patients (33.3%). Tears biochemical analysis showed elevated levels of interferon gamma, IL 6, IL 8, IL 10, IL 12AP70, IL 17A, MMP 9 and VEGF in oGVHD eyes as compared to non-oGVHD & control eyes. Non-oGVHD eyes showed elevated tear MMP 7 and MMP 9 as compared to healthy controls. Tear protein levels were significantly decreased in oGVHD eyes and were equivocal in nonGVHD and control eyes. TBUT and ocular staining scores to correlate best with tear interleukins and MMPs. Conclusion: Evaluation of levels of tear VEGF, total protein & MMP 9 can be of significance in identifying oGVHD in post alloHSCT patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据