4.7 Article

Numerical study on overtopping performance of a multi-level breakwater for wave energy conversion

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 94-101

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.058

关键词

Wave energy conversion; Multi-level overtopping breakwater; Numerical wave tank; Overtopping discharges; Shape parameters

资金

  1. Key Basic Program of Shandong Natural Science Funds [ZR2017ZA0202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51779239]
  3. Shandong Key Technology Project [2016GSF115016]
  4. Qingdao S&T People-Benefit Project [17-6-3-25-gx]
  5. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (111 project) [B14028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overtopping wave energy converter (OWEC) is capable of converting the unstable wave energy into the relatively stable potential energy in its reservoir. The small wave height and the large tidal range in China will cause a lower efficiency of the traditional single-level overtopping device especially at the lower tidal level. The design of the multi-level reservoirs may be a solution to improve the overtopping performance, which can be integrated in the sloping-ramp breakwater. In this study, a multi-level breakwater for wave energy conversion, consisting of two reservoirs with sloping walls at different levels, is proposed. A numerical wave tank based on the VOF model is established in ANSYS-Fluent (R) 12.0 for the OVVEC's performance investigation. The numerical model on predicting the overtopping process and time-averaged discharges is validated by corresponding experimental data. Effects of the opening width of the lower reservoir, sloping angles of two reservoirs and the gap height between the reservoirs on the dimensionless overtopping discharges are studied numerically. It is found that a smaller opening width, larger height ratio, and two sloping angles of 30 degrees have positive effects to improve the overtopping performance of the device.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据