4.7 Article

Real-time forecasting of wave heights using EOF - wavelet - neural network hybrid model

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 48-59

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.044

关键词

Artificial neural network; Empirical orthogonal function; Hybrid model; Significant wave height; Wave forecasting; Wavelet

资金

  1. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Republic of Korea [20140057]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, along with the development of data-driven models, artificial neural networks (ANN) have been used in ocean wave forecasting models. Hybridization of ANN with wavelet analysis or fuzzy logic approach has also been used. The wavelet and neural network hybrid models (WNN models) show better performance than ANN models. However, their accuracy decreases with increasing lead time because they do not consider the relation between wave and meteorological variables. Moreover, the WNN model has been developed to forecast the wave height at a single location where the past wave height data are available. To resolve these problems, in this paper, a hybrid model is developed by combining the empirical orthogonal function analysis and wavelet analysis with the neural network (abbreviated as EOFWNN model). The past wave height data at multiple locations and the past and future meteorological data in the surrounding area including the wave stations are used as input data. The model then forecasts the wave heights at the locations for various lead times. The developed model is employed to forecast the wave heights at eight wave observation stations in the coastal waters around the East/Japan Sea. The EOFWNN model is shown to perform better compared with the WNN model for all lead times regardless of the decomposition level of wavelet analysis. The EOFWNN model is proven to be a promising tool for forecasting wave heights at multiple locations where the past wave height data and the past and future meteorological data in the surrounding area are available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据