4.7 Article

Drag on and flow through the hydroid-fouled nets in currents

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 161, 期 -, 页码 195-204

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.05.005

关键词

Aquaculture net; Biofouling; Drag coefficient; Laboratory experiment; Numerical simulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51609035, 51579037, 51409037, 51221961, 51609043]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M590224, 2017T100176]
  3. Fundamental Research for the Central Universities [DUT16YQ105, DUT18LK41]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering of China [LP1723]
  5. Key Laboratory of Coastal Disaster and Defense, Ministry of Education, China [2016001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biofouling is an inevitable problem in marine aquaculture and it is prone to cause many negative effects on the hydrodynamic behavior of the aquaculture facility. In this study, the dominant biofouling on the netting of fish farms in the Yellow Sea of China was determined by field sampling. Plane nets with various levels of biofouling were obtained by submerging nets at different depths and for different durations. Drag acting on the biofouled nets in currents were investigated using laboratory experiment. The results indicate that drag acting on the net increases with increasing level of biofouling. Compared to the clean net, the accumulation of biofouling can lead to over 10 times more hydrodynamic load on nets. Flow fields around the biofouled nets were simulated using a porous-media fluid model which was validated by corresponding laboratory experiment. As the level of biofouling increases, the flow velocity downstream from the net decreases continuously. The net with the greatest level of biofouling produces the most serious shielding effect with 21.4% reduction in flow velocity. Using the proposed empirical equations, both the drag on and flow velocity downstream from a hydroid-fouled net can be predicted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据