4.4 Article

EndoBarrier®: a Safe and Effective Novel Treatment for Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes?

期刊

OBESITY SURGERY
卷 28, 期 7, 页码 1980-1989

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-018-3123-1

关键词

Obesity; Type 2 diabetes; Bariatric surgery; Bypass surgery; Duodenal-jejunal sleeve

类别

资金

  1. GI Dynamics, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aims Obesity associated with diabetes mellitus is a significant worldwide problem associated with considerable health care costs. Whilst surgical intervention is effective, it is invasive, costly and associated with complications. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the EndoBarrier (R), a duodenal-jejunal sleeve bypass as an alternative treatment of diabetes mellitus in obese patients. Materials and Methods This was a multi-centre, non-randomised trial recruiting obese patients with type 2 diabetes from three sites in the UK. Eligible participants had a BMI of 30-50 kg/m(2) and HbA1c levels of 7.5-10%. The study comprised a 12-month period with the EndoBarrier (R) inserted and a 6-month follow-up period after it had been explanted. The primary study outcomes were weight, BMI, HbA1c levels and fasting insulin and glucose levels. Results Forty-five patients were recruited and 31 patients (69%) completed the 12-month study period. Significant reductions in weight (95%CI 0.62-29.38; p < 0.05) and BMI (95%CI 1.1-8.7; p < 0.005) were documented 12 months after device insertion. The mean HbA1c was significantly reduced (95%CI 0.1-1.6; p < 0.05) after the device insertion period and reductions in metabolic parameters (fasting insulin and glucose levels) were also documented during the study. Adverse events were also assessed in all patients, the vast majority of which were reported as mild. Conclusions The EndoBarrier (R) appears to be a safe and effective treatment strategy in overweight patients with poor glycaemic control despite medical therapy, or in those who are eligible but decline bariatric surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据