4.5 Article

Bioavailability of coenzyme Q10 supplements depends on carrier lipids and solubilization

期刊

NUTRITION
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 133-140

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.05.020

关键词

Ubiquinol; Ubiquinone; Bioavailability; Human; Coenzyme Q10

资金

  1. Pharma Nord, Denmark
  2. Andalusian Government (FEDER funds of European Commission) [BIO177]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Bioavailability of supplements with coenzyme Q10 (CoQ(10)) in humans seems to depend on the excipients of formulations and on physiological characteristics of the individuals. The aim of this study was to determine which factors presented in CoQ(10) supplements affect the different response to CoQ(10) in humans. Methods: We tested seven different supplement formulations containing 100 mg of CoQ(10) in 14 young, healthy individuals. Bioavailability was measured as area under the curve of plasma CoQ(10) levels over 48 h after ingestion of a single dose. Measurements were repeated in the same group of 14 volunteers in a double-blind crossover design with a minimum of 4 wk washout between intakes. Results: Bioavailability of the formulations showed large differences that were statistically significant. The two best absorbable formulations were soft -gel capsules containing ubiquinone (oxidized CoQ(10)) or ubiquinol (reduced CoQ(10)). The matrix used to dissolve CoQ(10) and the proportion and addition of preservatives such as vitamin C affected the bioavailability of CoQ(10). Although control measurements documented that all formulations contained 100 mg of either CoQ10 or ubiquinol, some of the participants showed high and others lower capacity to reach high increase of CoQ(10) in blood, indicating the participation of individual unknown physiological factors. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of individually adapted selection of best formulations to reach the highest bioavailability of CoQ(10) in humans. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据