4.8 Article

Positive-sense RNA viruses reveal the complexity and dynamics of the cellular and viral epitranscriptomes during infection

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 11, 页码 5776-5791

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky029

关键词

-

资金

  1. University at Albany-SUNY and New York State Start-up Funds
  2. Presidential Initiatives Fund for Research and Scholarship (PIFRS)
  3. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
  4. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [R21 AI133617-01]
  5. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01 GM121844-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

More than 140 post-transcriptional modifications (PTMs) are known to decorate cellular RNAs, but their incidence, identity and significance in viral RNA are still largely unknown. We have developed an agnostic analytical approach to comprehensively survey PTMs on viral and cellular RNAs. Specifically, we used mass spectrometry to analyze PTMs on total RNA isolated from cells infected with Zika virus, Dengue virus, hepatitis C virus (HCV), poliovirus and human immunodeficiency virus type 1. All five RNA viruses significantly altered global PTM landscapes. Examination of PTM profiles of individual viral genomes isolated by affinity capture revealed a plethora of PTMs on viral RNAs, which far exceeds the handful of well-characterized modifications. Direct comparison of viral epitranscriptomes identified common and virus-specific PTMs. In particular, specific dimethylcytosine modifications were only present in total RNA from virus-infected cells, and in intracellular HCV RNA, and viral RNA from Zika and HCV virions. Moreover, dimethylcytosine abundance during viral infection was modulated by the cellular DEAD-box RNA helicase DDX6. By opening the Pandora's box on viral PTMs, this report presents numerous questions and hypotheses on PTM function and strongly supports PTMs as a new tier of regulation by which RNA viruses subvert the host and evade cellular surveillance systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据