4.8 Article

Flap endonuclease overexpression drives genome instability and DNA damage hypersensitivity in a PCNA-dependent manner

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 11, 页码 5634-5650

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky313

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [GM074917]
  2. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, Impact Grant [702310]
  3. Masonic Cancer Center at the University of Minnesota, Brainstorm Award
  4. Graduate School at the University of Minnesota Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada PGS-D Award
  6. NIH [R01GM074917]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overexpression of the flap endonuclease FEN1 has been observed in a variety of cancer types and is a marker for poor prognosis. To better understand the cellular consequences of FEN1 overexpression we utilized a model of its Saccharomyces cerevisiae homolog, RAD27. In this system, we discovered that flap endonuclease overexpression impedes replication fork progression and leads to an accumulation of cells in mid-S phase. This was accompanied by increased phosphorylation of the checkpoint kinase Rad53 and histone H2A-S129. RAD27 overexpressing cells were hypersensitive to treatment with DNA damaging agents, and defective in ubiquitinating the replication clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) at lysine 164. These effects were reversed when the interaction between overexpressed Rad27 and PCNA was ablated, suggesting that the observed phenotypes were linked to problems in DNA replication. RAD27 overexpressing cells also exhibited an unexpected dependence on the SUMO ligases SIZ1 and MMS21 for viability. Importantly, we found that overexpression of FEN1 in human cells also led to phosphorylation of CHK1, CHK2, RPA32 and histone H2AX, all markers of genome instability. Our data indicate that flap endonuclease overexpression is a driver of genome instability in yeast and human cells that impairs DNA replication in a manner dependent on its interaction with PCNA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据