4.8 Article

Effect of UV irradiation on Sulfolobus acidocaldarius and involvement of the general transcription factor TFB3 in the early UV response

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 14, 页码 7179-7192

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky527

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [DFG Graduate Training Program] [1431]
  2. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03120078A, 031L0078C, 031L0078D, FKZ 031A533]
  3. Ministry of Education and Training, Vietnam [911]
  4. European Research council [ERC starting grant, ARCHAELLUM] [311523]
  5. University Duisburg-Essen
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [311523] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to UV light can result in severe DNA damage. The alternative general transcription factor (GTF) TFB3 has been proposed to play a key role in the UV stress response in the thermoacidophilic crenarchaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. Reporter gene assays confirmed that tfb3 is upregulated 90-180 min after UV treatment. In vivo tagging and immunodetection of TFB3 confirmed the induced expression at 90 min. Analysis of a tfb3 insertion mutant showed that genes encoding proteins of the Ups pili and the Ced DNA importer are no longer induced in a tfb3 insertion mutant after UV treatment, which was confirmed by aggregation assays. Thus, TFB3 plays a crucial role in the activation of these genes. Genome wide transcriptome analysis allowed a differentiation between a TFB3-dependent and a TFB3-independent early UV response. The TFB3-dependent UV response is characterized by the early induction of TFB3, followed by TFB3-dependent expression of genes involved in e.g. Ups pili formation and the Ced DNA importer. Many genes were downregulated in the tfb3 insertion mutant confirming the hypothesis that TFB3 acts as an activator of transcription. The TFB3-independent UV response includes the repression of nucleotide metabolism, replication and cell cycle progression in order to allow DNA repair.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据