4.7 Article

In vivo MRI signatures of hippocampal subfield pathology in intractable epilepsy

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 1103-1119

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23090

关键词

DTI; hippocampal sclerosis; hippocampal subfields; histology; MRI; temporal lobe epilepsy; volumetry

资金

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research [MOP 184807]
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation [20994]
  3. NSERC Create Grant CAMI Award at Western University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesOur aim is to assess the subfield-specific histopathological correlates of hippocampal volume and intensity changes (T1, T2) as well as diff!usion MRI markers in TLE, and investigate the efficacy of quantitative MRI measures in predicting histopathology in vivo. Experimental DesignWe correlated in vivo volumetry, T2 signal, quantitative T1 mapping, as well as diffusion MRI parameters with histological features of hippocampal sclerosis in a subfield-specific manner. We made use of on an advanced co-registration pipeline that provided a seamless integration of preoperative 3 T MRI with postoperative histopathological data, on which metrics of cell loss and gliosis were quantitatively assessed in CA1, CA2/3, and CA4/DG. Principal ObservationsMRI volumes across all subfields were positively correlated with neuronal density and size. Higher T2 intensity related to increased GFAP fraction in CA1, while quantitative T1 and diffusion MRI parameters showed negative correlations with neuronal density in CA4 and DG. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that in vivo multiparametric MRI can predict neuronal loss in all the analyzed subfields with up to 90% accuracy. ConclusionOur results, based on an accurate co-registration pipeline and a subfield-specific analysis of MRI and histology, demonstrate the potential of MRI volumetry, diffusion, and quantitative T1 as accurate in vivo biomarkers of hippocampal pathology. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1103-1119, 2016. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据