4.3 Article

A cohort study to identify simple clinical tests for chronic respiratory failure in obese patients with sleep-disordered breathing

期刊

BMJ OPEN RESPIRATORY RESEARCH
卷 1, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000022

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Facility at Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust
  2. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  3. King's College London

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chronic respiratory failure complicating sleep-disordered breathing in obese patients has important adverse clinical implications in terms of morbidity, mortality and healthcare utilisation. Screening strategies are essential to identify obese patients with chronic respiratory failure. Method: Prospective data were collected from patients with obesity-related sleep-disordered breathing admitted for respiratory assessment at a UK national sleep and ventilation centre. Hypercapnia was defined as an arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide of > 6 kPa. Results: 245 obese patients (56 +/- 13 years) with a body mass index of 48 +/- 12 kg/m(2), forced vital capacity (FVC) of 2.1 +/- 1.1 L, daytime oximetry (SpO(2)) of 91 +/- 6% and abnormal overnight oximetry were included in the analysis. Receiver operator curve analysis for the whole group showed that an FVC <= 3 L had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 41% in predicting hypercapnia, and an SpO(2) = 95% had a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 63% in predicting hypercapnia. Gender differences were observed and receiver operator curve analysis demonstrated 'cut-offs' for (1) SpO(2) of <= 95% for men and <= 93% for women and (2) FVC of <= 3.5 L for men and <= 2.3 L for women, in predicting hypercapnia. Conclusions: The measurement of FVC and clinic SpO(2) in obese patients with abnormal overnight limited respiratory studies predicted hypercapnia. This may have clinical utility in stratifying patients attending sleep clinics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据