4.7 Article

Optimized adaptive tracking control for an underactuated vibro-driven capsule system

期刊

NONLINEAR DYNAMICS
卷 94, 期 3, 页码 1803-1817

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-018-4458-9

关键词

Adaptive control; Trajectory generation; Optimization; Auxiliary variable; Underactuated systems

资金

  1. European Commission Marie Sklodowska-Curie SMOOTH (Smart robots for fire-fighting) project [H2020-MSCA-RISE-2016-734875]
  2. Royal Society International Exchanges Scheme (Adaptive Learning Control of a Cardiovascular Robot using Expert Surgeon Techniques) project [IE151224]
  3. European Commission International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (IRSES) RABOT project [PIRSES-GA-2012-318902]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper studies the issue of adaptive trajectory tracking control for an underactuated vibro-driven capsule system and presents a novel motion generation framework. In this framework, feasible motion trajectory is derived through investigating dynamic constraints and kernel control indexes that underlie the underactuated dynamics. Due to the underactuated nature of the capsule system, the global motion dynamics cannot be directly controlled. The main objective of optimization is to indirectly control the friction-induced stick-slip motions to reshape the passive dynamics and, by doing so, to obtain optimal system performance in terms of average speed and energy efficacy. Two tracking control schemes are designed using a closed-loop feedback linearization approach and an adaptive variable structure control method with an auxiliary control variable, respectively. The reference model is accurately matched in a finite-time horizon. The key point is to define an exogenous state variable whose dynamics is employed as a control input. The tracking performance and system stability are investigated through rigorous theoretic analysis. Extensive simulation studies are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the developed trajectory model and optimized adaptive control system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据