4.4 Article

Apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer: correlation with molecular markers Ki-67, HIF-1 and VEGF

期刊

NMR IN BIOMEDICINE
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3884

关键词

ADC; HIF-1; Ki-67; prostate cancer; VEGF

资金

  1. Primary Research & Development Plan of Shandong Province [2015GSF118053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men. The Gleason score (GS) and biomarkers play important roles in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with PCa. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the molecular markers Ki-67, hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in PCa. Thirty-nine patients with 39 lesions, who had been diagnosed with PCa, were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) (b = 800s/mm(2)). The expression of Ki-67, HIF-1 and VEGF was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Statistical analysis was applied to analyze the association between ADC and prostate-specific antigen (PSA), GS and the expression of Ki-67, HIF-1 and VEGF. The group differences in ADC among different grades of Ki-67, HIF-1 and VEGF were also analyzed. The mean +/- standard deviation of ADC was (0.76 +/- 0.27) x 10(-3)mm(2)/s. ADC correlated negatively with PSA and GS (p < 0.05). The Ki-67 staining index (SI), HIF-1 expression and VEGF expression in PCa were correlated inversely with ADC, controlling for age (r = -0.332, p < 0.05; r = -0.662, p < 0.0005; and r = -0.714, p < 0.0005, respectively). ADC showed a significant difference among different grades of Ki-67 (F = 9.164, p = 0.005), HIF-1 (F = 40.333, p < 0.0005) and VEGF (F = 22.048, p < 0.0005). In conclusion, ADC was correlated with PSA, GS, and Ki-67, HIF-1 and VEGF expression in patients with PCa. ADC may be used to evaluate tumor proliferation, hypoxia and angiogenesis in PCa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据