4.4 Review

NO-GC in cells 'off the beaten track'

期刊

NITRIC OXIDE-BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 12-18

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.niox.2018.03.020

关键词

Nitric oxide; cGMP; Guanylyl cyclase; Immunohistochemistry; Pericytes; Cardiomyocytes; Gastrointestinal motility

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FR 1725/3-1, 1725/1-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitric oxide-sensitive guanylyl cyclase (NO-GC) has been shown to regulate a plethora of different functions in the body. These include, among many others, the fine-tuning of vascular tone, platelet reactivity and gastrointestinal motility. Evidence for the participation of NO-GC in these functions has been obtained from various species including humans, rodents, as well as insects. Clearly, individual cell types that express NO-GC contribute differentially to organ-specific NO/cGMP signaling in the body. Hence, identification of NO-GC-expressing cells and their individual involvement in NO/cGMP signaling constituted the focus of many studies over the last 40 years. Probably most information has been obtained from vascular smooth muscle cells and platelets, in which NO-GC is known to induce relaxation and inhibition of aggregation, respectively. Many other cell types that express the enzyme have been linked to certain functions, e.g. cardiomyocyte/inotropy or gastrointestinal smooth muscle cells/motility. However, in some cell types, e.g. myofibroblasts or pericytes, NO-GC expression is evident but individual functions of NO/cGMP signaling have yet to be assigned, whereas in other cell types, e.g. in erythrocytes, expression and role of NO-GC is still a matter of debate. This review discusses the current knowledge on less popular' cell types that express NO-GC (pericytes, myofibroblasts, cardiomyocytes, adipocytes, interstitial cells of Cajal, fibroblast-like cells and blood cells) and outlines possible further functions in cell types that have not gained strong attention so far.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据