4.6 Article

Intraspecific differences in plant defense induction by fall armyworm strains

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 218, 期 1, 页码 310-321

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14981

关键词

caterpillar saliva; fall armyworm; glucose oxidase; host strains; maize; phospholipase C (PLC); plant defenses; Spodoptera frugiperda

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-1256326]
  2. United States Department of Agriculture [2011-67013-30352]
  3. Pennsylvania State University
  4. Entomological Society of America
  5. NIFA [579634, 2011-67013-30352] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The underlying adaptive mechanisms by which insect strains are associated with specific plants are largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the role of herbivore-induced defenses in the host plant association of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) strains. We tested the expression of herbivore-induced defense-related genes and the activity of plant-defensive proteins in maize and Bermuda grass upon feeding by fall armyworm strains. The rice strain caterpillars induced greater accumulation of proteinase inhibitors in maize than the corn strain caterpillars. In Bermuda grass, feeding by the corn strain suppressed induction of trypsin inhibitor activity whereas the rice strain induced greater activity levels. Differences in elicitation of these plant defenses by the two strains seems to be due to differences in the activity levels of the salivary enzyme phospholipase C. The levels of plant defense responses were negatively correlated with caterpillar growth, indicating a fitness effect. Our results indicate that specific elicitors in the saliva of fall armyworm stains trigger differential levels of plant defense responses that affect caterpillar growth and thus may influence host plant associations in field conditions. The composition and secretion of plant defense elicitors may have a strong influence in the host plant association of insect herbivores.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据