4.6 Article

Quantifying soil moisture impacts on light use efficiency across biomes

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 218, 期 4, 页码 1430-1449

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15123

关键词

drought impacts; eddy covariance; gross primary productivity (GPP); light use efficiency; photosynthesis; soil moisture; standardized precipitation index; vapour pressure deficit (VPD

资金

  1. ERC [H2020-MSCA-IF-2015, ERC-SyG-2013-610028]
  2. project FIBER [701329]
  3. Spanish Government [CGL2016-79835-P]
  4. Catalan Government [SGR 2014-274]
  5. NASA Terrestrial Ecology Program IDS Award [NNH17AE86I]
  6. EU FP7 programme through ERC DROUGHT-HEAT project [617518]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Terrestrial primary productivity and carbon cycle impacts of droughts are commonly quantified using vapour pressure deficit (VPD) data and remotely sensed greenness, without accounting for soil moisture. However, soil moisture limitation is known to strongly affect plant physiology. Here, we investigate light use efficiency, the ratio of gross primary productivity (GPP) to absorbed light. We derive its fractional reduction due to soil moisture (fLUE), separated from VPD and greenness changes, using artificial neural networks trained on eddy covariance data, multiple soil moisture datasets and remotely sensed greenness. This reveals substantial impacts of soil moisture alone that reduce GPP by up to 40% at sites located in sub-humid, semi-arid or arid regions. For sites in relatively moist climates, we find, paradoxically, a muted fLUE response to drying soil, but reduced fLUE under wet conditions. fLUE identifies substantial drought impacts that are not captured when relying solely on VPD and greenness changes and, when seasonally recurring, are missed by traditional, anomaly-based drought indices. Counter to common assumptions, fLUE reductions are largest in drought-deciduous vegetation, including grasslands. Our results highlight the necessity to account for soil moisture limitation in terrestrial primary productivity data products, especially for drought-related assessments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据