4.8 Article

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 378, 期 14, 页码 1277-1290

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  2. Ono Pharmaceutical
  3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center [P30 CA008748]
  4. Pfizer
  5. Novartis
  6. Eisai
  7. Exelixis
  8. Genentech/Roche
  9. Epizyme
  10. Mirati Therapeutics
  11. Argos Therapeutics
  12. Nektar
  13. Oncorena
  14. Merck
  15. Array BioPharma
  16. Genentech BioOncology
  17. Prometheus Laboratories
  18. Merck Sharp Dohme
  19. Astellas Pharma
  20. Bayer
  21. AstraZeneca
  22. Genentech
  23. Peloton Therapeutics
  24. Tracon Pharmaceuticals
  25. Cerulean Pharma
  26. Foundation Medicine
  27. GlaxoSmithKline
  28. Corvus Pharmaceuticals
  29. Acceleron Pharma
  30. Aveo Pharmaceuticals
  31. Dendreon
  32. Eli Lilly
  33. Clovis Oncology
  34. Horizon Pharma
  35. Inovio Pharmaceuticals
  36. SynerGene Therapeutics
  37. Ipsen
  38. Sanofi
  39. EUSA Pharma
  40. Janssen
  41. Celldex Therapeutics
  42. Bayer HealthCare
  43. Hexal
  44. Apogepha
  45. Intuitive Surgical
  46. Sanofi-Aventis
  47. Amgen
  48. MedUpdate
  49. Novartger Ingelheim
  50. Taiho Pharmaceutical
  51. Mylan
  52. Merrimack Pharmaceuticals
  53. AbbVie
  54. BioMarin Pharmaceutical
  55. Daiichi Sankyo
  56. Abraxis BioScience
  57. Asana BioSciences
  58. AB Science
  59. Mediis
  60. Boehrinvation
  61. ImClone
  62. LEO Pharma
  63. Millennium Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Nivolumab plus ipilimumab produced objective responses in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma in a pilot study. This phase 3 trial compared nivolumab plus ipilimumab with sunitinib for previously untreated clear-cell advanced renal-cell carcinoma. METHODS We randomly assigned adults in a 1:1 ratio to receive either nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram of body weight) plus ipilimumab (1 mg per kilogram) intravenously every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 2 weeks, or sunitinib (50 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). The coprimary end points were overall survival (alpha level, 0.04), objective response rate (alpha level, 0.001), and progression-free survival (alpha level, 0.009) among patients with intermediate or poor prognostic risk. RESULTS A total of 1096 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab (550 patients) or sunitinib (546 patients); 425 and 422, respectively, had intermediate or poor risk. At a median follow-up of 25.2 months in intermediate-and poor-risk patients, the 18-month overall survival rate was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70 to 78) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 60% (95% CI, 55 to 65) with sunitinib; the median overall survival was not reached with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 26.0 months with sunitinib (hazard ratio for death, 0.63; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 42% versus 27% (P<0.001), and the complete response rate was 9% versus 1%. The median progression-free survival was 11.6 months and 8.4 months, respectively (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.82; P = 0.03, not significant per the prespecified 0.009 threshold). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 509 of 547 patients (93%) in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group and 521 of 535 patients (97%) in the sunitinib group; grade 3 or 4 events occurred in 250 patients (46%) and 335 patients (63%), respectively. Treatment- related adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred in 22% and 12% of the patients in the respective groups. CONCLUSIONS Overall survival and objective response rates were significantly higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with sunitinib among intermediate-and poor-risk patients with previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据