4.8 Article

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 378, 期 21, 页码 1965-1975

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800385

关键词

-

资金

  1. Direction de la Recherche Clinique et du Developpement (DRCD), Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris (APHP), from the French Ministry of Health (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique [PHRC 2009 081224]
  2. Maquet
  3. Baxter
  4. Hemovent
  5. Medtronic
  6. Philips
  7. ResMed
  8. Hamilton Medical
  9. Fisher and Paykel
  10. Getinge France
  11. Medtronic-Covidien
  12. Air Liquide
  13. General Electric
  14. Novalung-Xenios
  15. Maquet Critical Care
  16. Kadence Healthcare (Johnson Johnson)
  17. Air Liquide Medical Systems
  18. Covidien
  19. Pfizer
  20. Drager

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND The efficacy of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial. METHODS In an international clinical trial, we randomly assigned patients with very severe ARDS, as indicated by one of three criteria - a ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (Pao(2)) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio(2)) of less than 50 mm Hg for more than 3 hours; a Pao(2):Fio(2) of less than 80 mm Hg for more than 6 hours; or an arterial blood pH of less than 7.25 with a partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide of at least 60 mm Hg for more than 6 hours - to receive immediate venovenous ECMO (ECMO group) or continued conventional treatment (control group). Crossover to ECMO was possible for patients in the control group who had refractory hypoxemia. The primary end point was mortality at 60 days. RESULTS At 60 days, 44 of 124 patients (35%) in the ECMO group and 57 of 125 (46%) in the control group had died (relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 1.04; P = 0.09). Crossover to ECMO occurred a mean (+/- SD) of 6.5 +/- 9.7 days after randomization in 35 patients (28%) in the control group, with 20 of these patients (57%) dying. The frequency of complications did not differ significantly between groups, except that there were more bleeding events leading to transfusion in the ECMO group than in the control group (in 46% vs. 28% of patients; absolute risk difference, 18 percentage points; 95% CI, 6 to 30) as well as more cases of severe thrombocytopenia (in 27% vs. 16%; absolute risk difference, 11 percentage points; 95% CI, 0 to 21) and fewer cases of ischemic stroke (in no patients vs. 5%; absolute risk difference, -5 percentage points; 95% CI, -10 to -2). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with very severe ARDS, 60-day mortality was not significantly lower with ECMO than with a strategy of conventional mechanical ventilation that included ECMO as rescue therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据