4.8 Article

Brentuximab Vedotin with Chemotherapy for Stage III or IV Hodgkin's Lymphoma

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 378, 期 4, 页码 331-344

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708984

关键词

-

资金

  1. Millennium Pharmaceuticals
  2. Seattle Genetics
  3. Amgen
  4. Bayer Healthcare
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  6. Cephalon
  7. F. Hoffmann-La Roche
  8. Genentech
  9. Janssen
  10. Lilly
  11. Merck
  12. NanoString Technologies
  13. Takeda
  14. Pharmacyclics
  15. Acerta
  16. Pfizer
  17. Celtrion
  18. Gilead
  19. TG Therapeutics
  20. MorphoSys
  21. Sandoz Novartis
  22. Servier
  23. Nordic Nanovector
  24. Spectrum
  25. LAM Therapeutics
  26. Celldex
  27. Affimed
  28. Regeneron
  29. Novartis
  30. Celgene
  31. Johnson Johnson
  32. Kyowa Hakko Kirin
  33. Mundipharma
  34. Roche
  35. Celltrion
  36. Eisa
  37. Janssen-Cilag
  38. AbbVie
  39. Teva Pharmaceuticals
  40. Immune Design
  41. Forty Seven
  42. AstraZeneca
  43. Kite
  44. GSK/Novartis
  45. Teva
  46. Boehringer Ingelheim
  47. Karyopham
  48. Ariad
  49. Sanofi
  50. Bayer
  51. TG Pharmaceuticals
  52. Merrimack
  53. Medimmune
  54. Merck Serono
  55. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA008748] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Brentuximab vedotin is an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate that has been approved for relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. METHODS We conducted an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial involving patients with previously untreated stage III or IV classic Hodgkin's lymphoma, in which 664 were assigned to receive brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD) and 670 were assigned to receive doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). The primary end point was modified progression-free survival (the time to progression, death, or noncomplete response and use of subsequent anticancer therapy) as adjudicated by an independent review committee. The key secondary end point was overall survival. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 24.9 months, 2-year modified progression-free survival rates in the A+AVD and ABVD groups were 82.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.7 to 85.0) and 77.2% (95% CI, 73.7 to 80.4), respectively, a difference of 4.9 percentage points (hazard ratio for an event of progression, death, or modified progression, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.98; P = 0.03). There were 28 deaths with A+AVD and 39 with ABVD (hazard ratio for interim overall survival, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.44 to 1.17]; P = 0.19). All secondary efficacy end points trended in favor of A+AVD. Neutropenia occurred in 58% of the patients receiving A+AVD and in 45% of those receiving ABVD; in the A+AVD group, the rate of febrile neutropenia was lower among the 83 patients who received primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor than among those who did not (11% vs. 21%). Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 67% of patients in the A+AVD group and in 43% of patients in the ABVD group; 67% of patients in the A+AVD group who had peripheral neuropathy had resolution or improvement at the last follow-up visit. Pulmonary toxicity of grade 3 or higher was reported in less than 1% of patients receiving A+AVD and in 3% of those receiving ABVD. Among the deaths that occurred during treatment, 7 of 9 in the A+AVD group were associated with neutropenia and 11 of 13 in the ABVD group were associated with pulmonary-related toxicity. CONCLUSIONS A+AVD had superior efficacy to ABVD in the treatment of patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma, with a 4.9 percentage-point lower combined risk of progression, death, or noncomplete response and use of subsequent anticancer therapy at 2 years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据