4.1 Article

An embryonic 100 μg/L lead exposure results in sex-specific expression changes in genes associated with the neurological system in female or cancer in male adult zebrafish brains

期刊

NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 60-69

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2017.10.006

关键词

DOHaD; Lead; MAPK; Sex differences; Transcriptomics; Zebrafish

资金

  1. Colgate Palmolive Grant for Alternative Research
  2. Purdue Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developmental lead (Pb) exposure is linked to neurological health issues. Results from non-human primate and rodent studies suggest detrimental effects of an early life Pb exposure, showing transcriptional disturbances and pathological evidence of Alzheimer's disease in the adult animal brain. To elucidate the impacts of an embryonic Pb exposure on the adult brain, transcriptomic analysis was completed on the brain of zebrafish aged 12 months exposed to a control treatment or to an embryonic 100 mu g/L Pb exposure by sex. In the adult female zebrafish brain, significant changes in expression profiles occurred in a number of genes involved in neurological disease and nervous system development and function. On the other hand, in adult males, a number of genes with significant expression alterations were found to be associated with cancer and tumors. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) was also indicated as an upstream regulator of observed gene expression changes. Western blot analysis confirmed activation of p38 MAPK in the form of phosphorylated p38 MAPK in the male zebrafish brain. In addition, we compared transcriptomic changes observed in this study to a previous study with an embryonic exposure of 10 mu g/L Pb by sex, showing unique sets of genes dependent on Pb concentration. Overall, these results show sex-specific and concentration-dependent disturbances of global gene expression patterns in the brain of adult zebrafish exposed to Pb during embryogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据