4.4 Article

Elevated stress hormone diminishes the strength of female preferences for acoustic signals in the green treefrog

期刊

HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 119-122

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.01.005

关键词

Corticosterone; Courtship signal; Glucocorticoid; Mate choice; Sex steroid

资金

  1. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
  2. University of Mississippi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mate selection can be stressful; time spent searching for mates can increase predation risk and/or decrease food consumption, resulting in elevated stress hormone levels. Both high predation risk and low food availability are often associated with increased variation in mate choice by females, but it is not clear whether stress hormone levels contribute to such variation in female behavior. We examined how the stress hormone corticosterone (CURT) affects female preferences for acoustic signals in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea. Specifically, we assessed whether CURT administration affects female preferences for call rate - an acoustic feature that is typically under directional selection via mate choice by females in most anurans and other species that communicate using acoustic signals. Using a dual speaker playback paradigm, we show that females that were administered higher doses of CURT were less likely to choose male advertisement calls broadcast at high rates. Neither CURT dose nor level was related to the latency of female phonotactic responses, suggesting that elevated CURT does not influence the motivation to mate. Results were also not related to circulating sex steroids (i.e., progesterone, androgens or estradiol) that have traditionally been the focus of studies examining the hormonal basis for variation in female mate choice. Our results thus indicate that elevated CURT levels decrease the strength of female preferences for acoustic signals. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据