4.4 Article

Ketogenic diet attenuates oxidative stress and inflammation after spinal cord injury by activating Nrf2 and suppressing the NF-κB signaling pathways

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 683, 期 -, 页码 13-18

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.06.016

关键词

Ketogenic diet; Spinal cord injury; Nrf2; NF-kappa B signaling pathway; Anti-oxidative stress; Anti-inflammatory

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of PR China [81261120563]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxidative stress and inflammation are two key secondary pathological mechanisms following spinal cord injury (SCI). Ketogenic diet (KD) and its metabolite beta-hydroxybutyrate have been found to exhibit anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory properties both in rats with SCI and in healthy rats; however, the underlying mechanisms are not yet fully understood. We investigated the effects of KD on the suppression of oxidative stress and inflammation, activation of nuclear factor-E2 related factor 2 (Nrf2), and inhibition of the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) signaling pathway in rats with SCI. We assessed functional recovery and evaluated the status of oxidative stress and inflammation using tests of superoxide dismutase and myeloperoxidase activity. We further assessed the presence of the proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1 beta), and interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) by ELISA. Western blotting was used to detect Nrf2 and NF-kappa B pathway-associated proteins in spinal cord tissue. Finally, we measured the levels of the NF-kappa B downstream genes TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, and IFN-gamma by western blotting and real-time quantitative PCR. Following SCI, KD improved functional recovery, attenuated oxidative stress and inflammation, and induced Nrf2 activation. In addition, KD suppressed the NF-kappa B pathway and the expression of TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, and IFN-gamma. Together, these findings provide new insight into the underlying regulatory mechanisms of KD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据