4.4 Article

High frequency stimulation induces LTD of AMPA receptor-mediated postsynaptic responses and LTP of synaptically-evoked firing in the dorsolateral striatum

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 666, 期 -, 页码 11-16

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.12.028

关键词

LIP; LTD; High frequency stimulation; Striatum; Dopamine; Spiking

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [2014-3254]
  2. Parkinsonfonden
  3. Karolinska Institute
  4. Stiftelsen for alderssjukdomar
  5. Karolinska Institute research fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the striatum, long term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) of glutamatergic transmission are believed to underlie motor learning and are impaired in animal models of Parkinson's disease. High frequency stimulation (HFS) is often used to induce synaptic plasticity in the brain. In the striatum, the polarity of HFS-induced plasticity is influenced by the recording conditions, which can differ between various studies. Here, we examined the ability of HFS to induce synaptic plasticity in the dorsolateral striatum in the presence of extra cellular Mg2+ ions, with no GABA(A) receptor blocker, and without membrane depolarization during HFS. We found that HFS induced a LTD of excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) mediated by AMPA receptors (AMPARs) in medium spiny neurons (MSNs) recorded with whole-cell voltage-clamp. However, HFS induced a LTP of field excitatory postsynaptic potentials/population spikes (fEPSP/PSs), which was dependent on the stimulation intensity applied. The rate of synaptically-evoked spiking in MSNs, measured with cell-attached recordings, showed LTP following HFS. LTD and LTP were impaired in the dopamine-depleted striatum of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesioned mice, a model of Parkinson's disease. This study shows that HFS induces opposing forms of dopamine-dependent synaptic plasticity in the striatum, i.e. LTD of AMPAR-EPSCs and LTP of both fEPSP/PS and synaptically-evoked firing in MSNs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据