4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Dopamine, the antipsychotic molecule: A perspective on mechanisms underlying antipsychotic response variability

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 85, 期 -, 页码 146-159

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.09.027

关键词

Schizophrenia; Antipsychotics; Endogenous dopamine; Indirect agonism; Dopamine D2 receptors; Pharmacogenetics; Therapeutic variability; Treatment efficacy and failure

资金

  1. intramural ELAN grants
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grants [AM 488/1-1]
  3. G.A.-Lienert-Foundation
  4. MRC [MR/N025377/1]
  5. Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
  6. NARSAD [23234]
  7. MRC [MR/N026063/1, MR/N025377/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [MR/N026063/1, MR/N025377/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All antipsychotics bind to the dopamine D2 receptor. An optimal level of D2 receptor blockade with anti-psychotics is thought to ameliorate the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. However, persistent D2 receptor blockade is associated with a deteriorating clinical response in a subset of patients. Interestingly, antipsychotics with a wealcer D2 receptor binding profile appear somewhat superior in this respect. This evidence challenges the hypothesis that D2 receptor blockade is the sole mechanism of antipsychotic efficacy and points to consistent inter-individual responses to antipsychotic treatment. Here, we hypothesize that clinically effective doses of antipsychotics would lead to the formation of a D2 receptor reserve that is likely composed of presynaptic dopamine D2 autoreceptors. The majority of the remaining postsynaptic dopamine receptors are instead occupied by antipsychotics. Endogenous dopamine would then mainly interact with this D2 autoreceptor reserve, thereby reducing the presynaptic synthesis and release of dopamine and resulting in an indirect antipsychotic effect. This new proposal reconciles conceptual and empirical gaps encountered when clinical outcomes are compared to the pharmacology of antipsychotics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据