4.7 Review

Towards a human self-regulation system: Common and distinct neural signatures of emotional and behavioural control

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 400-410

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.04.022

关键词

Cognitive control; Emotion regulation; Executive functions; ALE meta-analysis; Resting-state fMRI; Functional decoding; Control theory

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [LA 3071/3-1, EI 816/4-1]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [R01-MH074457]
  3. Helmholtz Portfolio Theme Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain
  4. European Union Seventh Framework Programme [604102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-regulation refers to controlling our emotions and actions in the pursuit of higher-order goals. Although research suggests commonalities in the cognitive control of emotion and action, evidence for a shared neural substrate is scant and largely circumstantial. Here we report on two large-scale meta-analyses of human neuroimaging studies on emotion or action control, yielding two fronto-parieto-insular networks. The networks' overlap, however, was restricted to four brain regions: posteromedial prefrontal cortex, bilateral anterior insula, and right temporo-parietal junction. Conversely, meta-analytic contrasts revealed major between-network differences, which were independently corroborated by clustering domain-specific regions based on their intrinsic functional connectivity, as well as by functionally characterizing network sub-clusters using the BrainMap database for quantitative forward and reverse inference. Collectively, our analyses identified a core system for implementing self-control across emotion and action, beyond which, however, either regulation facet appears to rely on broadly similar yet distinct subnetworks. These insights into the neurocircuitry subserving affective and executive facets of self-control suggest both processing commonalities and differences between the two aspects of human self-regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据