4.3 Article

Parental Concerns Influencing Decisions to Seek Medical Care for a Child's Short Stature

期刊

HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS
卷 84, 期 5, 页码 338-348

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000440804

关键词

Growth; Short children; Clinical decision-making; Parent; Growth hormone treatment

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [1R01 HD57037]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [UL1TR000003]
  3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: To examine parental concerns about child growth and factors that drive parents' decisions whether to intervene medically with their child's height. Methods: Parents of 9-to 14-year-old pediatric primary care patients of various heights, oversampled for those with short stature, participated in exploratory focus groups and nominal group technique sessions. Growth concerns expressed by the groups were incorporated into a survey, completed by 1,820 parents, and rated for their degree of impact on medical decision-making. Ordinal logistic regression modeled concern scores against parent traits. Explanatory focus groups clarified the survey results. Results: Research team consensus and factor analysis organized the 22 distinct concerns expressed by the parent groups into 7 categories. Categories rated as having the greatest influence on parental decision-making involved: treatment efficacy and side effects, child health and psychosocial function. Level of concern was highly associated with parental education and parenting style. Conclusion: Psychosocial issues are influential, but parental decision-making is most impacted by concerns about treatment and child health. By discussing the real risks and benefits of hormone treatment and addressing parents' perceptions of what is needed for physical and psychosocial health, clinicians can be highly effective educators to assure that treatment is used only as medically indicated. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据