4.5 Article

Impaired Fast Network Oscillations and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in a Mouse Model of Alpha-synucleinopathy (A30P)

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 377, 期 -, 页码 161-173

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.02.032

关键词

hippocampus; gamma oscillations; alpha-synuclein; mitochondria; rotenone

资金

  1. Medical Research Council CASE [MR/L015528/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intracellular accumulation of alpha-synuclein (alpha-syn) is a key pathological process evident in Lewy body dementias (LBDs), including Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). LBD results in marked cognitive impairments and changes in cortical networks. To assess the impact of abnormal alpha-syn expression on cortical network oscillations relevant to cognitive function, we studied changes in fast beta/gamma network oscillations in the hippocampus in a mouse line that over-expresses human mutant alpha-syn (A30P). We found an age-dependent reduction in the power of the gamma (20-80 Hz) frequency oscillations in slices taken from mice aged 9-16 months (9+A30P), that was not present in either young 2-6 months old (2+A30P) mice, or in control mice at either age. The mitochondrial blockers potassium cyanide and rotenone both reduced network oscillations in a concentration-dependent manner in aged A30P mice and aged control mice but slices from A30P mice showed a greater reduction in the oscillations. Histochemical analysis showed an age-dependent reduction in cytochrome c oxidase (COX) activity, suggesting a mitochondrial dysfunction in the 9+A30P group. A deficit in COX IV expression was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Overall, our data demonstrate an age-dependent impairment in mitochondrial function and gamma frequency activity associated with the abnormal expression of alpha-syn. These findings provide mechanistic insights into the consequences of over-expression of alpha-syn which might contribute to cognitive decline. (C) 2018 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据