4.3 Article

Anxiety-like behaviour assessments of adolescent rats after repeated maternal separation during early life

期刊

NEUROREPORT
卷 29, 期 8, 页码 643-649

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000001010

关键词

anxiety; early handling; locomotor activity; maternal separation

资金

  1. Education teaching reform and research foundation of Weifang Medical University [2015Y024]
  2. Research Award Foundation Programme for Outstanding Young Scientists in the Shandong Province [BS2014YY043]
  3. Science and Technology Foundation Programme of colleges and universities of the Shandong Province [J17KB096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maternal separation (MS) plays a central role in developing physiology and psychology during the individual ontogeny process. MS is used to research the neurobiological mechanisms of mental disorders and early life stress. In this study, we investigated the effects of repeated MS and early handling (EH) on locomotor activity in an open-field test, a light-dark box test and an elevated plus-maze test of adolescent rats. The results showed that MS reduced locomotor activities in the open-field test, and increased anxiety-like behaviours in the light-dark box test and the elevated plus-maze test in adolescent rats. These tests indicated that early life stress caused by MS might induce anxiety-like behaviours during adolescence. However, compared with the control group, both the MS and EH groups showed conflicting anxiety levels. The results also suggested that females were more prone to showing anxiety-like behaviour compared with males when suffering from high-intensity stimulation. However, because of the low anxiety level associated with EH, the sex difference in behaviour was not significant. The present study provides novel insights into the effects of MS and EH on behaviour, which shows unique anxiety levels different in adolescent male and female rats. Copyright (C) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据