4.5 Review

Review: Revisiting the human cholinergic nucleus of the diagonal band of Broca

期刊

NEUROPATHOLOGY AND APPLIED NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 44, 期 7, 页码 647-662

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nan.12513

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; basal forebrain; cholinergic system; diagonal band of Broca; Lewy body dementia; Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. HKU Alzheimer's Disease Research Network under Strategic Research Theme of Healthy Aging
  2. NIA [AG12411]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P01AG012411] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the nucleus of the vertical limb of the diagonal band of Broca (nvlDBB) is the second largest cholinergic nucleus in the basal forebrain, after the nucleus basalis of Meynert, it has not generally been a focus for studies of neurodegenerative disorders. However, the nvlDBB has an important projection to the hippocampus and discrete lesions of the rostral basal forebrain have been shown to disrupt retrieval memory function, a major deficit seen in patients with Lewy body disorders. One reason for its neglect is that the anatomical boundaries of the nvlDBB are ill defined and this area of the brain is not part of routine diagnostic sampling protocols. We have reviewed the history and anatomy of the nvlDBB and now propose guidelines for distinguishing nvlDBB from other neighbouring cholinergic cell groups for standardizing future clinicopathological work. Thorough review of the literature regarding neurodegenerative conditions reveals inconsistent results in terms of cholinergic neuronal loss within the nvlDBB. This is likely to be due to the use of variable neuronal inclusion criteria and omission of cholinergic immunohistochemical markers. Extrapolating from those studies showing a significant nvlDBB neuronal loss in Lewy body dementia, we propose an anatomical and functional connection between the cholinergic component of the nvlDBB (Ch2) and the CA2 subfield in the hippocampus which may be especially vulnerable in Lewy body disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据