4.8 Article

Synaptogyrin-3 Mediates Presynaptic Dysfunction Induced by Tau

期刊

NEURON
卷 97, 期 4, 页码 823-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.022

关键词

-

资金

  1. ERC CoG [646671]
  2. ERC StG [311083]
  3. IWT
  4. BELSPO [P7/16]
  5. Methusalem grant of the Flemish government [METH/14/07]
  6. Opening the Future (LUF)
  7. Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen (FWO)
  8. Odysseus (FWO)
  9. IMI (IMPRIND)
  10. UK Dementia Research Institute (Medical Research Council)
  11. VIB
  12. UK Dementia Research Institute (Alzheimer's Society)
  13. UK Dementia Research Institute (Alzheimer's Research UK)
  14. MRC [MC_PC_17116, UKDRI-4004] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. Alzheimers Research UK [ARUK-SPG2013-1] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_17116, UKDRI-4004] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synaptic dysfunction is an early pathological feature of neurodegenerative diseases associated with Tau, including Alzheimer's disease. Interfering with early synaptic dysfunction may be therapeutically beneficial to prevent cognitive decline and disease progression, but the mechanisms underlying synaptic defects associated with Tau are unclear. In disease conditions, Tau mislocalizes into pre- and postsynaptic compartments; here we show that, under pathological conditions, Tau binds to presynaptic vesicles in Alzheimer's disease patient brain. We define that the binding of Tau to synaptic vesicles is mediated by the transmembrane vesicle protein Synaptogyrin-3. In fly and mouse models of Tauopathy, reduction of Synaptogyrin-3 prevents the association of presynaptic Tau with vesicles, alleviates Tau-induced defects in vesicle mobility, and restores neurotransmitter release. This work therefore identifies Synaptogyrin-3 as the binding partner of Tau on synaptic vesicles, revealing a new presynapse-specific Tau interactor, which may contribute to early synaptic dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases associated with Tau.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据