4.6 Article

Pilot-scale demonstration of SPORL for bioconversion of lodgepole pine to bioethanol and lignosulfonate

期刊

HOLZFORSCHUNG
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 21-30

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/hf-2014-0332

关键词

biofuel; enzymatic saccharification/hydrolysis; forest biorefinery; high solids fermentation; lignosulfonate; process scale-up

资金

  1. USDA Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Phase II project [2010-33610-21589]
  2. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China (ISTCP) [2013DFA41670]
  3. NIFA [580375, 2010-33610-21589] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The process sulfite pretreatment to overcome recalcitrance of lignocelluloses (SPORL) has been the focus of this study. Pilot-scale (50 kg) pretreatment of wood chips of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Douglas ex Loudon) killed by mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins) were conducted at 165 degrees C with a dilute sulfite solution of pH 2 for bioconversion to ethanol and lignosulfonate (LS). The pretreatment duration was optimized in laboratory bench scale experiments with a certain severity based on a combined hydrolysis factor (CHF). The sodium bisulfite loading was 8% and the liquor to wood ratio 3. The pretreated solids were disk milled together with the spent liquid and the resultant slurry with a 25% solids content was directly (without detoxification) submitted to a simultaneous enzymatic saccharification and fermentation (SSF) with Saccharomyces cerevisiae YRH400 at cellulase loading of 35 ml kg(-1) of untreated wood. At solids loading of 20%, the alcohol yield was 288 l t(-1) wood (with a final concentration of 52.2 g l(-1)), which corresponds to a 72.0% theoretical yield based on total glucan, mannan, and xylan. The LS from SPORL was highly sulfonated and its molecular weight was lower than that of a purified commercial softwood LS, and therefore it has a high potential as a directly marketable co-product.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据