4.7 Article

Prevalence of preclinical Alzheimer disease Comparison of current classification systems

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 90, 期 19, 页码 E1682-E1691

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005476

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [2012-5041, 2013-8717, 2015-02830]
  2. Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare [2013-1202, AGECAP 2013-2300, 2013-2496, 20130475]
  3. Swedish Alzheimerfoundation
  4. Hjarnfonden
  5. Stena Foundation
  6. Sahlgrenska University Hospital (ALF)
  7. Torsten Soderbergs Stiftelse at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
  8. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  9. Emil and Maria Palm Foundation
  10. Alma och Anna Ylen's Foundation
  11. Konung Gustaf V:s och Drottning Victorias Frimurarestiftelse
  12. Eivind och Elsa K:son Sylvans stiftelse
  13. Stiftelsen Soderstrom-Konigska Sjukhemmet
  14. Stiftelsen for Gamla Tjanarinnor
  15. Handlanden Hjalmar Svenssons Forskningsfond
  16. Stiftelsen Demensfonden
  17. Stiftelsen Wilhelm and Martina Lundgrens Vetenskapsfond
  18. Stiftelsen Professor Bror Gadelius' Minnesfond
  19. Goteborg Medical Services and Social Services Administrations
  20. Fredrik and Rosa von Malborgs Foundation for Brain Research
  21. Swedish Research Council [2015-02830] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To determine the prevalence of preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD) according to current classification systems by examining CSF from a representative general population sample of 70-year-olds from Gothenburg, Sweden. Method The sample was derived from the population-based H70 Gothenburg Birth Cohort Studies in Gothenburg, Sweden. The participants (n = 322, age 70 years) underwent comprehensive neuropsychiatric, cognitive, and somatic examinations. CSF levels of beta-amyloid (A beta)(42), A beta(40), total tau, and phosphorylated tau were measured. Preclinical AD was classified according to criteria of the A/T/N system, Dubois 2016, National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria, and International Working Group-2 (IWG-2) criteria. Individuals with Clinical Dementia Rating score > 0 were excluded, leaving 259 cognitively unimpaired individuals. Results The prevalence of amyloid pathology was 22.8%, of total tau pathology was 33.2%, and of phosphorylated tau pathology was 6.9%. With the A/T/N system, the prevalence of A+/T-/N- was 13.1%, A+/T-/N+ was 7.3%, A+/T+/N+ was 2.3%, A-/T-/N+ was 18.9%, and A-/T+/N+ was 4.6%. When the Dubois criteria were applied, the prevalence of asymptomatic at risk for AD was 36.7% and of preclinical AD was 9.7%. With the NIA-AA criteria, the prevalence of stage 1 was 13.1% and stage 2 was 9.7%. With the IWG-2 criteria, the prevalence of asymptomatic at risk for AD was 9.7%. The APOE epsilon 4 allele was associated with several of the categories. Men more often had total tau pathology, A+/T-/N+, preclinical AD according to Dubois 2016, asymptomatic at risk for AD according to the IWG-2 criteria, and NIA-AA stage 2. Conclusion The prevalence of pathologic AD markers was very common (46%) in a representative population sample of 70-year-olds. The clinical implications of these findings need to be scrutinized further in longitudinal studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据