4.6 Article

Ocular Rigidity, Outflow Facility, Ocular Pulse Amplitude, and Pulsatile Ocular Blood Flow in Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Manometric Study

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 54, 期 7, 页码 4571-4577

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12303

关键词

glaucoma; biomechanics; blood flow; aqueous outflow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. To compare ocular rigidity (OR) and outflow facility (C) coefficients in medically treated open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients and controls, and to investigate differences in ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) and pulsatile ocular blood flow (POBF) between the two groups. METHODS. Twenty-one OAG patients and 21 controls undergoing cataract surgery were enrolled. Patients with early or moderate primary or pseudoexfoliative OAG participated in the glaucoma group. A computer-controlled system, consisting of a pressure transducer and a microstepping device was employed intraoperatively. After cannulation of the anterior chamber, IOP was increased by infusing the eye with microvolumes of saline solution. IOP was recorded after each infusion step. At an IOP of 40 mm Hg, an IOP decay curve was recorded for 4 minutes. OR coefficients, C, OPA, and POBF were estimated from IOP and volume recordings. RESULTS. There were no differences in age or axial length in the two groups. The OR coefficient was 0.0220 +/- 0.0053 mu l(-1) in the OAG and 0.0222 +/- 0.0039 mu l(-1) in the control group (P = 0.868). C was 0.092 +/- 0.082 mu L/min/mm Hg in the glaucoma group compared with 0.149 +/- 0.085 mu L/min/mm Hg in the control group at an IOP of 35 mm Hg (P < 0.001) and 0.178 +/- 0.133 mu L/min/mm Hg vs. 0.292 +/- 0.166 mu L/min/mm Hg, respectively, at an IOP of 25 mm Hg (P < 0.001). There were no differences in OPA or POBF between the two groups in baseline and increased levels of IOP (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS. Manometric data reveal lower C in OAG patients and increased C with increasing IOP. There were no differences in the OR coefficient, OPA, and POBF between medically treated OAG patients and controls, failing to provide evidence of altered scleral distensibility and choroidal blood flow in OAG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据