4.6 Article

Study on the plasma protein binding rate of Schisandra lignans based on the LC-IT-TOF/MS technique with relative quantitative analysis

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF NATURAL MEDICINES
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 442-448

出版社

CHINESE JOURNAL NATURAL MEDICINES
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1009.2013.00442

关键词

Schisandra chinensis extract; Schisandra lignans; Protein binding ratio; LC-IT-TOF/MS

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [88102881]
  2. Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University [JKGQ201109]
  3. Project Program of six talents peak, Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main objective of the current study was to develop a universal method for a protein binding assay of complicated herbal components, and to investigate the possible relationship between compound polarity and protein binding using Schisadra lignans as an example. Firstly, the rat, dog and human plasma were spiked with three different concentrations of Schisandra chinensis extract (SLE), and ultramicrofiltration was used to obtain the unbound ingredients. Secondly, thirty-one Schisandra lignans in total plasma and ultrafiltered fluid were measured by LC-IT-TOFMS. Lastly, a relative exposure approach, which entailed calculating the relative concentrations of each Schisandra lignan from the corresponding calibration equation created from the calibration samples spiked with the stock solution of SLE, was applied in order to overcome the absence of authentic standards. The results showed that Schisandra lignans exhibited a high capability to bind with plasma protein, furthermore, the protein binding ratio of the lignan components increased proportionally with their individual chromatographic retention time, which indicated that the ratio of protein binding of lignans might increase accordingly with decreasing polarity. This study suggested that the compound polarity might be an important factor affecting the plasma protein binding of herbal components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据