4.4 Article

Reproducibility of gastric emptying assessed with scintigraphy in patients with upper GI symptoms

期刊

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13365

关键词

diabetes mellitus; gastric emptying; gastroparesis; reproducibility; scintigraphy

资金

  1. USPHS NIH Grant [R01 DK068055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundThe reproducibility of gastric emptying (GE) measured with scintigraphy in patients is poorly understood. Our aims were to assess the intra and inter-individual reproducibility of these parameters in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. MethodsSixty patients (21 diabetics, 39 non-diabetics) with upper gastrointestinal symptoms underwent scintigraphic-assessment of GE of a solid meal (296kcal, 30% fat) over 4hours on two occasions at an average interval of 15days. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), intra and inter-individual coefficients of variation (COV) of GE endpoints were analyzed. ResultsThe GE t(1/2) was 1348minutes (mean +/- SEM) for the first and 128 +/- 6minutes for the second study. The mean (95% CI) CCC between the two studies was 0.79 (0.67, 0.87) for GE at 1hour, 0.83 (0.75, 0.9) for GE at 2hours, 0.54 (0.34, 0.7) for GE at 4hours, and 0.79 (0.68, 0.86) for GE t(1/2). However, in 18 of 60 patients (30%), the characterization of GE as normal, delayed, or rapid differed between the first and second studies. For gastric empting t(1/2), the inter-individual coefficients of variation was 40%; the intra-individual COV was 20%, comparable in diabetics and non-diabetics, and greater in patients with rapid (28%) than delayed (18%) or normal GE (12%). Conclusions & InferencesAmong patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms, GE measured with scintigraphy is relatively reproducible. In 30% of cases, the interpretation was different between the two assessments. Hence, a diagnosis of gastroparesis based on a single study may occasionally be inaccurate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据