4.3 Article

Bacteriological and Physico-Chemical Quality of Main Drinking Water Sources

期刊

POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 825-830

出版社

HARD

关键词

drinking water; public health; coliform; CFU; physico-chemical parameters

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi (DST) [DST/TM/WTI/2K10/265]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drinking water quality assessment in Mahabubnagar has been always been crucial with reference to public health. A study was conducted to evaluate the bacteriological and physico-chemical analysis of drinking water supply of the Mahabubnagar district in India. Four samples were collected from Ramanpadu and Koilsagar water (both natural reservoir and filtered), and for each sample bacteriological parameters and chemical parameters were evaluated. The bacteriological results indicated that the bacterial count was highest in Ramanpadu water (RP-736 CFU/ml) and the least count was found in Koilsagar water (KS-06 CFU/ml). The total plate count revealed the highest count in Koilsagar filter (KSF) water and the least in Koilsagar (KS) water. The most probable number method was used to detect and count the total coliform and E. coli. Results revealed that the one indicator bacteria were present in two samples (RP and RPF). The samples were monitored for the various physicochemical parameters comprising pH, EC, color, turbidity, phenolpthalene alkalinity, methyl orange alkalinity, total alkalinity, total hardness, phenolic compounds, anionic detergents, residual chlorine, mineral oil, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons as PAH, cyanide, Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, HCO3-, SO42-, NO3-, Cl-, F-, and trace metals such as Fe, Cu, Mn, Zn, Cd, Pb, Hg, Se, Ag, and Cr. The pH of water samples was alkaline and varied from 7.21 to 7.96, and the mean value was 7.52. In this study, all 4 samples did not exceed the reference values for chemical parameters. The results showed that physiochemical parameters are within permissible limits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据