4.6 Article

Remaining useful life estimation of engineered systems using vanilla LSTM neural networks

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 275, 期 -, 页码 167-179

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.05.063

关键词

Long short-term memory neural network; Remaining useful life estimation; Prognostics and health management; Dynamic differential feature

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51375030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks are a significant branch of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), capable of learning long-term dependencies. In recent years, vanilla LSTM (a variation of original LSTM above) has become the state-of-the-art model for a variety of machine learning problems, especially Natural Language Processing (NLP). However, in industry, this powerful Deep Neural Network (DNN) has not aroused wide concern. In research focusing on Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) technology for complex engineered systems, Remaining Useful Life (RUL) estimation is one of the most challenging problems, which can lead to appropriate maintenance actions to be scheduled proactively to avoid catastrophic failures and minimize economic losses of the systems. Following that, this paper aims to propose utilizing vanilla LSTM neural networks to get good RUL prediction accuracy which makes the most of long short-term memory ability, in the cases of complicated operations, working conditions, model degradations and strong noises. In addition, to promote cognition ability about model degradation processes, a dynamic differential technology was proposed to extract inter-frame information. The whole proposition is illustrated and discussed by performing tests on a case of the health monitoring of aircraft turbofan engines which have four different issues. Performances of vanilla LSTM are benchmarked with standard RNN and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) LSTM. Results show the significance of performance improvement achieved by vanilla LSTM. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据