4.6 Article

Multiphase batch process with transitions monitoring based on global preserving statistics slow feature analysis

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 293, 期 -, 页码 64-86

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.02.091

关键词

Multiphase batch process; Transition; Phase division; Slow feature analysis; Process monitoring

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61273160, 61403418]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2014FL016, ZR2016FQ21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most previous studies have shown that the multiphase characteristics of batch processes are critical for process monitoring; however, revealing and utilizing the information of multiplicity in multiphase batch process monitoring remains challenging. In this paper, statistics slow feature analysis (SSFA) is developed to extract slowly varying information at the same sampling time among different batches based on various statistics of the original variables. Then, a new index called the phase recognition factor (PRF), which is based on SSFA, is introduced to automatically achieve phase division. The proposed PRF takes advantage of the time sequence of process phases and does not require predefined parameters. After phase division, global preserving SSFA (GSSFA) is proposed not only to explore the time-varying dynamic information of batch processes but also to consider the mining of global data structure information. Furthermore, a novel process monitoring strategy based on the GSSFA model is developed to monitor batch processes with transitions. In each steady phase, a representative GSSFA model is built for process monitoring; in the transition period, different local GSSFA models are constructed online to monitor the test samples based on the just-in-time learning method. Two case studies, one simple numerical multiphase system and a benchmark fed-batch penicillin fermentation process, are used to demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据