4.5 Article

Intraneuronal accumulation of C99 contributes to synaptic alterations, apathy-like behavior, and spatial learning deficits in 3 x TgAD and 2 x TgAD mice

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 71, 期 -, 页码 21-31

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.06.038

关键词

C99; A beta; 2 x TgAD; 3 x TgAD; Alzheimer's disease; Behavior; Actimetry; Morris water maze

资金

  1. LABEX (excellence laboratory, program investment for the future) DISTALZ (Development of Innovative Strategies for a Transdisciplinary approach to Alzheimer's disease)
  2. Association France Alzheimer
  3. University Hospital Federation (FHU OncoAge)
  4. DISTALZ
  5. Conseil Departemental des Alpes-Maritimes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The triple transgenic mouse model (3 x TgAD: APP(swe), Tau(P301L), PS1(M146V)) recapitulates both amyloid beta (A beta)- and tau-related lesions as well as synaptic and memory deficits. In these mice, we reported an early apathy-like behavior and alterations in synaptic plasticity appearing concomitantly with intraneuronal accumulation of C99 in the subiculum. To delineate the genuine contribution of C99 on the above phenotypes, we generated double transgenic mice (2 x TgAD: APPswe, TauP301L) that accumulate C99 without Ab deposition or hyperphosphorylation of tau and compared them to 3 x TgAD mice. Here, we show that both TgAD mice display similar decreases in long-term potentiation and in spontaneous locomotor activity measured by actimetry suggesting that the synaptic alterations and the apathy-like behavior were likely linked to C99 rather than Ab. However, spatial learning alterations, assessed by the Morris water maze task, are more pronounced in 3 x TgAD than in 2 x TgAD, suggesting that both Ab and C99 contribute to defects in the acquisition of spatial information. Finally, even if similar results are observed in males, cognitive and non-cognitive deficits are more severe in females. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据