4.6 Article

Voltage adjustment improves rigidity and tremor in Parkinson's disease patients receiving deep brain stimulation

期刊

NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 347-352

出版社

MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS & MEDIA PVT LTD
DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.226406

关键词

nerve regeneration; deep brain stimulation; Parkinson's disease; subthalamic nucleus; voltage; pulse width; frequency; tremor; rigidity; bradykinesia; axial symptoms; neural regeneration

资金

  1. Science and Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [2014A030304019]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [2015A030313164]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is recognized as the most effective treatment for moderate and advanced Parkinson's disease. Programming of the stimulation parameters is important for maintaining the efficacy of deep brain stimulation. Voltage is considered to be the most effective programming parameter. The present study is a retrospective analysis of six patients with Parkinson's disease (four men and two women, aged 37-65 years), who underwent bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, China, and who subsequently adjusted only the stimulation voltage. We evaluated motor symptom severity using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III, symptom progression using the Hoehn and Yahr scale, and the levodopa equivalent daily dose, before surgery and 1 and 2 years after surgery. The 2-year follow-up results show that rigidity and tremor improved, and clinical symptoms were reduced, while pulse width was maintained at 60 mu s and frequency at 130 Hz. Voltage adjustment alone is particularly suitable for patients who cannot tolerate multiparameter program adjustment. Levodopa equivalent daily dose was markedly reduced 1 and 2 years after surgery compared with baseline. Our results confirm that rigidity, tremor and bradykinesia can be best alleviated by voltage adjustment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据