4.5 Article

An Improved Method for Semantic Image Inpainting with GANs: Progressive Inpainting

期刊

NEURAL PROCESSING LETTERS
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 1355-1367

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11063-018-9877-6

关键词

Semantic image inpainting; Generative adversarial networks; Progressive inpainting; Pyramid strategy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61673402, 61273270, 60802069]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong [2017A030311029, 2016B010109002, 2015B090912001, 2016B010123005, 2017B090909005]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201704020180, 201604020024]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Semantic image inpainting is getting more and more attention due to its increasing usage. Existing methods make inference based on either local data or external information. Generating Adversarial Networks, as a research focus in recent years, has been proven to be useful in inpainting work. One of the most representative is the deep-generative-modelbased approach, which use undamaged images for training and repair the corrupted image with the trained networks. However, thismethod is too dependent on the training process, easily resulting in the completed image blurry in details. In this paper, we propose an improved method named progressive inpainting. With the trained networks, we use back-propagation to find the most appropriate input distribution and use the generator to repair the corrupted image. Instead of repairing the image in one step, we take a pyramid strategy from a lowresolution image to higher one, with the purpose of getting a clear completed image and reducing the reliance on the training process. The advantage of progressive inpainting is that we can predict the general distribution of the corrupted image and then gradually refine the details. Experiment results on two datasets show that our method successfully reconstructs the image and outperforms most existing methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据