4.6 Article

A novel modified BSA inspired by species evolution rule and simulated annealing principle for constrained engineering optimization problems

期刊

NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 4157-4184

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-017-3329-5

关键词

Backtracking search optimization algorithm; Evolutionary algorithms; Simulated annealing; Constrained optimization problems

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61663009]
  2. State Key Labrotary of Silicate Materials for Architectures (Wuhan University of Technology) [SYSJJ2018-21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The backtracking search optimization algorithm (BSA) is one of the recently proposed evolutionary algorithms (EAs) for solving numerical optimization problems. In this study, a nature-inspired modified BSA (called SSBSA) is proposed and investigated to improve the exploitation and convergence performance of BSA. Inspired by the species evolution rule and the simulated annealing principle, this paper proposes two modified strategies through introducing a specified retain mechanism and an acceptance probability into BSA. In SSBSA, the specified previous individuals of historical population (oldP) and their corresponding amplitude control factors (F) are retained according to the fitness feedback for the next iteration, and a new adaptive F that could decrease as the number of iterations increases is redesigned by learning the acceptance probability. SSBSA has two main advantages: (1) The way to retain the specified previous information improves BSA's exploitation capability. (2) This new F adaptively controls the diversity of population which makes convergence faster. Simulation experiments are carried on fourteen constrained benchmarks and engineering design problems to test the performance of SSBSA. To fully evaluate the performance of SSBSA, several comparisons between SSBSA and other well-known algorithms are implemented. The experimental results show that SSBSA improves the performance of BSA and its performance is more competitive than that of the other algorithms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据