4.7 Article

Determination of z ∼ 0.8 neutral hydrogen fluctuations using the 21 cm intensity mapping autocorrelation

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slt074

关键词

galaxies: evolution; large-scale structure of universe; radio lines: galaxies

资金

  1. NSERC Canada
  2. CIFAR
  3. NSF [AST-1009615]
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology [2012AA121701]
  5. NSFC [11073024]
  6. McWilliams Center for Cosmology
  7. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1009615] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  11. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1211777] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The large-scale distribution of neutral hydrogen in the Universe will be luminous through its 21 cm emission. Here, for the first time, we use the auto-power spectrum of 21 cm intensity fluctuations to constrain neutral hydrogen fluctuations at z similar to 0.8. Our data were acquired with the Green Bank Telescope and span the redshift range 0.6 < z < 1 over two fields totalling approximate to 41 deg(2) and 190 h of radio integration time. The dominant synchrotron foregrounds exceed the signal by similar to 10(3), but have fewer degrees of freedom and can be removed efficiently. Even in the presence of residual foregrounds, the auto-power can still be interpreted as an upper bound on the 21 cm signal. Our previous measurements of the cross-correlation of 21 cm intensity and the WiggleZ galaxy survey provide a lower bound. Through a Bayesian treatment of signal and foregrounds, we can combine both fields in auto-and cross-power into a measurement of Omega(H I)b(H I) = [0.62(0.15)(+0.23)] x 10(-3) at 68 per cent confidence with 9 per cent systematic calibration uncertainty, where Omega(H I) is the neutral hydrogen (H I) fraction and b(H I) is the HI bias parameter. We describe observational challenges with the present data set and plans to overcome them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据