4.5 Article

Oocyte DNA damage quality control requires consecutive interplay of CHK2 and CK1 to activate p63

期刊

NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 261-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41594-018-0035-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG [DO 545/8-1]
  2. Centre for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance (BMRZ)
  3. Cluster of Excellence Frankfurt (Macromolecular Complexes)
  4. Funds of the Chemical Industry
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim
  6. Covert Italia S.p.A.
  7. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [1097737]
  8. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  9. Genome Canada through the Ontario Genomics Institute
  10. GlaxoSmithKline
  11. Karolinska Institutet
  12. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  13. Ontario Innovation Trust
  14. Ontario Ministry for Research and Innovation
  15. Merck Co., Inc.
  16. Novartis Research Foundation
  17. Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems
  18. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  19. Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The survival rate of cancer patients is steadily increasing, owing to more efficient therapies. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian insufficiency (P01) could identify targets for prevention of P01. Loss of the primordial follicle reserve is the most important cause of POI, with the p53 family member p63 being responsible for DNA-damage-induced apoptosis of resting oocytes. Here, we provide the first detailed mechanistic insight into the activation of p63, a process that requires phosphorylation by both the priming kinase CHK2 and the executioner kinase CK1 in mouse primordial follicles. We further describe the structural changes induced by phosphorylation that enable p63 to adopt its active tetrameric conformation and demonstrate that previously discussed phosphorylation by c-Abl is not involved in this process. Inhibition of CK1 rescues primary oocytes from doxorubicin and cisplatin-induced apoptosis, thus uncovering a new target for the development of fertoprotective therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据