4.7 Review

The gut-liver axis and the intersection with the microbiome

期刊

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41575-018-0011-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 AI043477, R01 CA118165, R01 AA020703, U01 AA021856, U01AA24726]
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the NIH [P42ES010337]
  3. Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service of the VA Office of Research and Development [I01BX002213]
  4. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  5. [R01-DK106419-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past decade, an exciting realization has been that diverse liver diseases -ranging from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, alcoholic steatohepatitis and cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma - fall along a spectrum. Work on the biology of the gut-liver axis has assisted in understanding the basic biology of both alcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Of immense importance is the advancement in understanding the role of the microbiome, driven by high-throughput DNA sequencing and improved computational techniques that enable the complexity of the microbiome to be interrogated, together with improved experimental designs. Here, we review gut-liver communications in liver disease, exploring the molecular, genetic and microbiome relationships and discussing prospects for exploiting the microbiome to determine liver disease stage and to predict the effects of pharmaceutical, dietary and other interventions at a population and individual level. Although much work remains to be done in understanding the relationship between the microbiome and liver disease, rapid progress towards clinical applications is being made, especially in study designs that complement human intervention studies with mechanistic work in mice that have been humanized in multiple respects, including the genetic, immunological and microbiome characteristics of individual patients. These 'avatar mice' could be especially useful for guiding new microbiome-based or microbiome-informed therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据