4.8 Review

Interleukin-6: designing specific therapeutics for a complex cytokine

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 395-412

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrd.2018.45

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, Germany [TRR128, SFB1054-B07, SFB877-A10, SFB841-C01, SFB877-A1]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, Germany (SyNergy)
  3. European Research Council (ERC) (EXODUS) [CoG 647215]
  4. German Ministry of Education and Research (T-B interaction in neuromyelitis optica)
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, Germany (Cluster of Excellence 'Inflammation at Interfaces')
  6. German Ministry of Education and Research (grant InTraSig)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pivotal cytokine with a diverse repertoire of physiological functions that include regulation of immune cell proliferation and differentiation. Dysregulation of IL-6 signalling is associated with inflammatory and lymphoproliferative disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis and Castleman disease, and several classes of therapeutics have been developed that target components of the IL-6 signalling pathway. So far, monoclonal antibodies against IL-6 or IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) and Janus kinases (JAK) inhibitors have been successfully developed for the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. However, clinical trials of agents targeting IL-6 signalling have also raised questions about the diseases and patient populations for which such agents have an appropriate benefit-risk profile. Knowledge from clinical trials and advances in our understanding of the complexities of IL-6 signalling, including the potential to target an IL-6 trans-signalling pathway, are now indicating novel opportunities for therapeutic intervention. In this Review, we overview the roles of IL-6 in health and disease and analyse progress with several approaches of inhibiting IL-6-signalling, with the aim of illuminating when and how to apply IL-6 blockade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据