4.7 Article

Generation of spatial-patterned early-developing cardiac organoids using human pluripotent stem cells

期刊

NATURE PROTOCOLS
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 723-737

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2018.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Nappi Family Foundation Research Scholar Project
  2. NIH-NIBIB [R21EB021003]
  3. NIH-NCATS [UH3TR000487]
  4. American Heart Association (AHA) postdoctoral fellowship [16POST27750031]
  5. National Science Foundation Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (NSF IGERT)
  6. [DMR-DGE-1068780]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The creation of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) has provided an unprecedented opportunity to study tissue morphogenesis and organ development through 'organogenesis-in-a-dish'. Current approaches to cardiac organoid engineering rely on either direct cardiac differentiation from embryoid bodies (EBs) or generation of aligned cardiac tissues from predifferentiated cardiomyocytes from monolayer hiPSCs. To experimentally model early cardiac organogenesis in vitro, our protocol combines biomaterials-based cell patterning with stem cell organoid engineering. 3D cardiac microchambers are created from 2D hiPSC colonies; these microchambers approximate an early-development heart with distinct spatial organization and self-assembly. With proper training in photolithography microfabrication, maintenance of human pluripotent stem cells, and cardiac differentiation, a graduate student with guidance will likely be able to carry out this experimental protocol, which requires similar to 3 weeks. We envisage that this in vitro model of human early heart development could serve as an embryotoxicity screening assay in drug discovery, regulation, and prescription for healthy fetal development. We anticipate that, when applied to hiPSC lines derived from patients with inherited diseases, this protocol can be used to study the disease mechanisms of cardiac malformations at an early stage of embryogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据