4.8 Article

A heterogeneous single-atom palladium catalyst surpassing homogeneous systems for Suzuki coupling

期刊

NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 702-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-018-0167-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. ETH Zurich
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021-169679]
  3. MINECO [CTQ2015-68770-R]
  4. MINECO La Caixa-Severo Ochoa through Severo Ochoa Excellence Accreditation [SEV-2013-0319]
  5. Juan de la Cierva-Incorporacion postdoctoral program [IJCI-2016-29762]
  6. Henslow Research Fellowship at Girton College, Cambridge
  7. EPSRC [EP/R008779/1]
  8. Physical Science Imaging Centre [EM16967]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Palladium-catalysed cross-coupling reactions, central tools in fine-chemical synthesis, predominantly employ soluble metal complexes despite recognized challenges with product purification and catalyst reusability(1-3). Attempts to tether these homogeneous catalysts on insoluble carriers have been thwarted by suboptimal stability, which leads to a progressively worsening performance due to metal leaching or clustering(4). The alternative application of supported Pd nanoparticles has faced limitations because of insufficient activity under the mild conditions required to avoid thermal degradation of the substrates or products. Single-atom heterogeneous catalysts lie at the frontiers(5-)(18). Here, we show that the Pd atoms anchored on exfoliated graphitic carbon nitride (Pd-ECN) capture the advantages of both worlds, as they comprise a solid catalyst that matches the high chemoselectivity and broad functional group tolerance of stateof-the-art homogeneous catalysts for Suzuki couplings, and also demonstrate a robust stability in flow. The adaptive coordination environment within the macroheterocycles of ECN facilitates each catalytic step. The findings illustrate the exciting opportunities presented by nanostructuring single atoms in solid hosts for catalytic processes that remain difficult to heterogenize.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据